Holidays


WASHINGTON (AP) ? Rates on 30-year mortgages dipped this week to the
lowest level in more than six months.
Mortgage giant Freddie Mac said Thursday that 30-year, fixed-rate
mortgages fell to an average 6.31% this week, from 6.40% last week.

The latest drop puts the average 30-year mortgage at the lowest level
since it stood at 6.24% in early March.

After hitting a four-year high 6.80% on July 20, rates on 30-year
mortgages have been trending down as financial markets became more
convinced that a slowing economy will help keep inflation contained.

Such a slowdown would allow the Federal Reserve to keep interest rates
on hold. Fed officials announced last week that they were leaving a key
interest rate unchanged for the second straight month.

Sharp declines this year in home sales and construction of new homes
have provided support for the view that the economy is slowing to a more
sustainable pace and eased worries about inflation.

Many analysts believe interest rates will hover around current levels
for the rest of the year. Such a development is expected to help the
housing industry level off after sharp declines in recent months that
have seen construction of new homes fall to the lowest levels in more
than three years and both new and existing homes experience price drops
when compared with prices a year ago.

“Both lower mortgage rates and a moderation in house price growth should
lead to increased housing affordability,” said Frank Nothaft, chief
economist for Freddie Mac.

Other types of mortgages showed declines this week as well.

Rates on 15-year, fixed-rate mortgages, a popular choice for
refinancing, averaged 5.98%, down from 6.06% last week.

For one-year adjustable-rate mortgages, rates dipped to 5.47% on
average, down from 5.54% last week.

Rates on five-year adjustable mortgages fell to an average 6.00% this
week, from 6.08% last week.

The mortgage rates do not include add-on fees known as points.
Thirty-year and 15-year fixed-rate mortgages both carried a nationwide
average fee of 0.4 point while one-year ARMs carried a fee of 0.6 point
and five-year ARMs carried an average fee of 0.5 point.

A year ago, 30-year mortgages averaged 5.91%, 15-year mortgages stood at
5.48%, one-year ARMs were at 4.68% and five-year ARMs averaged 5.44%.

By Lou Barnes Inman NewsÂ

Mortgage rates are a hair lower, with the lowest-fee, 30-year stuff approaching 6.75 percent, taken by the 10-year T-note’s decline to 5.05 percent.Â

Why the 10-year has fallen toward the bottom of the four-month, 5-5.25 percent band is a matter of sorting dogs that bite from ones that merely bark. Ditto for measuring the odds of falling out of the bottom of that band.Â

The 21st century is only five years old, but this week has brought another in an already long list of new-century lessons on the difference between the effective use of force and counter-productive use, whether in the name of self-defense, redress of grievance, or moral imperative.Â

Events in and near Palestine this week do present a low-order risk of wider conflict and a threat to oil supplies. However, this latest spasm of righteous retribution among peoples who hate each other but are chained together has had little effect on financial markets, and instead produced widespread disgust at all parties involved — even Arab condemnation of Syria as Hezbollah accelerant.Â

As the news has arrived, first from Gaza, now Lebanon, oil prices have moved, but the three bucks from $74 to $77 is hardly a panic, and has alternate explanation. There has been no news-synchronized flight of cash to Treasurys for safety. The stock market is having an awful time, now testing multi-year lows, but has reasons far from the Middle East to do so (the Middle East does make good cover, though).Â

The bond market has been moving lower in yield in the two weeks since the Fed’s last meeting on a consistent string of reports of a slowing economy, and rising oil prices. The pattern: the consumer is showing signs of long-expected exhaustion.Â

Today we learned that retail sales failed to grow for the third month in a row, down 0.1 percent versus expectations of a gain. Makes sense, as the employment cost index (tipped upside down, a good measure of income from employment) has gained only 2.6 percent in the last year, the lowest gain on record, versus much higher energy and interest costs and the gradual evaporation of the wealth effect from home prices.Â

The energy picture is disturbing. A global-security spike in oil prices would soon reverse; and, unfortunately, that’s not what this is. American gasoline consumption is running at the same level as last year, and we are competing with some hefty buyers. China’s oil imports surged 15 percent in the first 90 days of 2006, double the forecast, but consistent with an economy growing almost 10 percent per year, and the dawn of affluence is disproportionately increasing appetites for energy (cars!).Â

Confounding everyone from those who would limit fossil-fuel use to prevent climate change to central bankers who would limit inflation, global energy demand continues to grow, firmly linked to GDP growth. Yes, we are more efficient, but as global GDP grows, oil demand grows faster than efficiency. US total consumption of gasoline has been the same since 1984, 55-65 million gallons per day. Automobiles are much more efficient, but there are a hell of a lot more of them, more every day.Â

Some in the bond market think this latest rise in oil prices will be the coup de grace for consumers, while others think the inflation hazard will force the Fed to hike one or more times, which in turn will put the final kibosh on consumers. It doesn’t matter which: kibosh is kibosh.Â

Stock market types are blaming oil, the Middle East, and North Korea for their evident distress, when a softening economy is a simpler explanation. Bonds have improved tick-for-tick on the stock market sell-off.Â

The Fed is at 5.25 percent, and the entire Treasury curve is farther below the Fed than last week. In the seven similar circumstances in the last 40 years, a recession ensued six times, and the one miss was due to a rapid retreat by the Fed.Â

Lou Barnes is a mortgage broker and nationally syndicated columnist based in Boulder, Colo. He can be reached at lbarnes@boulderwest.com.

451 new franchises sold worldwide in first half of 2006Â

Franchise sales for global real estate franchisor RE/MAX International are slightly ahead of projections for 2006, and were 1.8 percent stronger than the same time period in 2005, according to statistics at the end of June.Â

A total of 451 new franchises had been sold by mid-year compared to 443 for 2005 which had set the previous record for first half of year sales and year end sales of 1,078, RE/MAX said today.Â

Strongest sales numbers from January through June were in Portugal with 24 followed by Turkey at 23. In the United States, the Carolinas region completed 21 sales, while Texas had 18. Both South Africa and Australia also sold 18 new franchises. California/Hawaii closed 17, and both the New York region and Central Atlantic (Virginia, Maryland, West Virginia and Washington, D.C.) regions sold 16.Â

“RE/MAX also expanded into Finland, Hungary, Romania and Mozambique this year,” said Peter Gilmour, RE/MAX senior vice president of international franchise sales and brokerage. “Expansion in European markets has been excellent for some time.”Â

The RE/MAX franchise network includes more than 6,522 independently owned offices and 119,500 member sales associates.Â

Compliments of Inman News July 14, 2006

After three months of declines, the pace of housing construction — measured by the number of new housing starts — rose 5% in May to a 1.957 million-unit annual pace, the Commerce Department reported June 20. (Economists had expected May housing starts to stabilize at a 1.85 million-unit pace.) Permits for future groundbreaking, an indicator of builder confidence, fell by 2.1% to a 1.932 million-unit pace in May, the lowest since November 2003 and the first time since January that total housing permits fell below starts.

The Conference Board, an industry-backed research group, said its Index of Leading Economic Indicators slipped 0.6%
in May after a 0.1% decline in April, which was in line with analysts’ expectations. Seven of the 10 indicators that comprise the closely watched index decreased, led by weekly jobless claims which rose by a larger-than-expected 11,000 for the week ending June 18.

Orders for durable goods — items expected to last three years or longer — fell 0.3% in May after an even bigger 4.7% plunge in April, the Commerce Department reported June 23. A decline in orders for commercial aircraft led the weaker-than-expected showing.

On June 22, Freddie Mac reported that interest rates on 30-year fixed-rate mortgages reached their highest level in more than four years. Not surprisingly, U.S. mortgage applications fell by 0.8% for the week ending June 16, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association. While the MBA’s purchase index rose 0.1%, refinances fell 2.2%.

This week look for updates on new home sales on June 26 and existing home sales on June 27.

A property survey is a map of a property showing where structures, servitudes, easements and boundaries are located. To most buyers, being required by the mortgage company to have an updated survey for closing just seems like a waste of money. And, who wants to spend more money than absolutely necessary?

But, a survey is like insurance. The chances of you ever really needing it are slim, but if you ever do need it, you will be glad you have it. CNN Money.com has a great article about folks who wished they had a survey. Highly recommended article for Home Buyers.
http://money.cnn.com/2006/05/23/real_estate/who_needs_a_survey/index.htm